Main Header
CSO Main Site Home
CSO CC Downloads
CSO Forums
CC Wiki


HELP CSO DONATIONS

Close Combat CSO CC Forums  

Go Back   Close Combat CSO CC Forums > CSO General Forums > CSO General Forum
Register FAQ Members List Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

CSO General Forum CSO General Forum for CC and CSO related topics

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10th October 2003   #1
Pz_meyer
Forums Poster
 
Pz_meyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Atlantis
Posts: 1,870
Rep Power: 15
Pz_meyer is moving up the ladder
Default I have a question for the cc community

The gist of my question is, based on all the studies and researches of this wonderful wwII history community, what percent of the Africa Korps was German and what percent was Italian? I do realize the Italians were in theatre long before any German set foot on North African sand, but let's say from 1941 to 1943. And where I am gettin at is just at how really out numbered and out gunned Rommel really was by first the British and combined byt the Americans and Free French. And by the way there were Vichy French who did on fact inflict casualties on the Americans so we can include them in the Axis forces. My opinion is there maybe a peak of 100,000 Germans, and this maybe high but I am trying to be fair.
Pz_meyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th October 2003   #2
106th ID
Forums Poster
 
106th ID's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Illinois
Age: 30
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 0
106th ID is so neutral he might be Swiss
Default

I'll look into this. I have a very good book called the Armies of Rommel. Give me a day or so and I should have a pretty in depth idea of what was available.
106th ID is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th October 2003   #3
Guillhaume
Forums Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 0
Guillhaume is so neutral he might be Swiss
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pz_meyer
The gist of my question is, based on all the studies and researches of this wonderful wwII history community, what percent of the Africa Korps was German and what percent was Italian?
Well, you will have to wait that 106th ID finish your search to know the number of Germans in North Africa. But i could to advance that the Afrika Korps were 100 % German. It was formed by German divisions in a separate Army Corps, who fight under nominaly Italian command, in the start of the campaign in Feb 41. Lieutnant-General Rommel was the commander, only of the German units. Sometimes, the Italian "Ariete" Armoured Division was attached to the Afrika Korps.

In the next years, all the Axis force were reunited in the Panzergruppe Afrika, Panzerarmee Afrika and the German-Italian Armeegruppe. These high commands, under Rommel's command comprise all the Italian troops and the German Afrika Korps.
Guillhaume is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th October 2003   #4
JimRM2
Moderator / RD_Oddball
 
JimRM2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,893
Rep Power: 10
JimRM2 does not have to buy his own drinks at a barJimRM2 does not have to buy his own drinks at a bar
Send a message via MSN to JimRM2
Default

Guillhaume is correct about the Afrika corps being 100% German.

I did find a bit of info in doing research for the CC5 Afrika mod that suggested that the DAK had "advisors" early in the African TO training Italians and being the eyes and ears for the German higher-ups. I remember the German unit being described as sort of a small token detatchment was doing the training. I think the Italian troops even wore DAK cuff titles and even some GE uniform markings. I think the Italian unit was a Black Shirt division. This question came up earlier this week but I couldn't remember my sources then either. An Osprey book or The March To Tunis or The Battle for North Afrika or even one of the many DAK websites. I can't remember sorry.

My source for stats titled "The Military Book Club's World War II - The encyclopedia of Facts and Figures" doesn't give totals at given points in time but the info can be gotten. I'll be glad to scan the tables for you if you'd like. Let's see what 106th ID can come up with. Let me know.
JimRM2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th October 2003   #5
106th ID
Forums Poster
 
106th ID's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Illinois
Age: 30
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 0
106th ID is so neutral he might be Swiss
Default

According to my research when Rommel first went to Africa he was to command a force made up of one panzer division and one light division. This was in early 1941. Before he had gone to help the Italians, they had lost about 130000 men as prisoners. In this initial stage he had the 5th Light Division, later to be reformed as the 21st Panzer Division. This unit comprised some 9,300 men. His other major unit, the 15th Panzer, which had 146 tanks at its disposal. It contained a large number of armored infantry and other support staff. A few battallion and company sized units were attached to the overall Corps, such as Luftwaffe AA(Regiment size), and Recce troops. He could also call on the support of 175 Luftwaffe planes, a mix of bombers and fighters. This Afrika Corps operated in "Battle Axe" and "Brevity".

By August of 41, Rommel had been given two more divisions. The first was Afrika Division z.b.V., later to be called the 90th Light Division. It was comprised of various independent units that were already operating in Africa. The second division was the 55th Savona Infantry division, an Italian division. These units combined with the aforementioned combined to make Panzergruppe Afrika. Also under Rommel's control was the XXI Italian Corps which consisted of 3 Italian Infantry Divisions and a fourth Motorized Infantry division, that was not actually mechanized due to a lack of decent transport. Overall Rommel had 119,000 men under his command. He had 400 tanks, but 150 were obsolete Italian models. He also had a battallion of Italian armored cars. This larger group participated in "Crusader" in late 41.

January of '42, Panzergruppe Arfika changed into PanzerArmee Afrika. It then participated in 'Operation Venezia.' During this time 2 more Italian infantry divisions, along with one Italian armored division joined them. Rommel had 332 tanks, mostly mk. III's, vs. 849 Allied tanks, mixed between Matilda II's, Grants, Valentines, Stuarts, and Crusaders. He did possess a air advantage as the Germans had more planes, and better planes in th bf-109f. Overall the summer campaign of '42 cost Rommel 2,300 kia Germans 7,500 wounded, 2,700 captured, and 1,000 kia Italians, 10,000 wounded, and 5,000 as pows. He claimed to have captured 60,000 Allied soldiers.

By late August Rommel had 104,000 men half of which were German. He had the original Afrika Corps, 15th and 21st Panzer divisions, 25,000 men. He also had 90th Light Division 12,500 men. The 164th Inf. Div, 11,500 men and a brigade of Fallschirmjager. He had 4 Italian infantry Divs. along with 2 armored, one mechanized and one parachute div. Assorted Armee units were attached as well. It was during this time that Romell received his first Tigers, but not in huge numbers.

After withdrawing of El-Alamein Rommel was charged with holding Tunisia, in late 1942. 'Operation Torch' had just occurred and Allied forces were moving to encircle the Axis forces still in Africa. Rommel had been given even more German units by now. Added were the 10th Panzer Div. 334th.Inf. Div. a unit known as Div. von Manteuffel, 999th Light Division Afrika, made up of convicts, and the 19th and 20th Flak divs. He also had four Italian divs. all infantry. Assorted other units from regiments to companies were also employed, mostly German.

These were the last battles for Rommel in Africa. He was relieved and recalled to Germany where HItler refused to let him return to Africa. his old unit eventually surrendered in may of 1943.
106th ID is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th October 2003   #6
106th ID
Forums Poster
 
106th ID's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Illinois
Age: 30
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 0
106th ID is so neutral he might be Swiss
Default

Uh yeah,100,000 Germans seems about right. Okay sorry about the book.
106th ID is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th October 2003   #7
Uberdave
Gubmint Mule
 
Uberdave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: First city of the Free State
Age: 36
Posts: 2,231
Rep Power: 16
Uberdave is  headed in the right direction
Default

The Italians were regarded by the Germans much like the Americans were by the Brits early in the war; poor troops to be used as cannon fodder....
Uberdave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th October 2003   #8
Pz_meyer
Forums Poster
 
Pz_meyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Atlantis
Posts: 1,870
Rep Power: 15
Pz_meyer is moving up the ladder
Default

I sometimes include Von Arnim's forces, that's why my guess of 100k Germans. When the African Axis forces surrendered there where about 300,000 soldiers taken into captivity. And I think most where I-talians. Some of the Italians did distinguish themselves in North Africa, I think they had same idea as th japanese in regard to weaponry. Neither Japan ot Italy tried to progressively upgrade their Inf weapons as the Germans continually did, HELPING to give poor performance.
Pz_meyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th October 2003   #9
Uberdave
Gubmint Mule
 
Uberdave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: First city of the Free State
Age: 36
Posts: 2,231
Rep Power: 16
Uberdave is  headed in the right direction
Default

True, most of the Japanese small arms were either rifles and pistols from 1904-1920, and their machine guns were all copies of foreign models like the Czech zb26/Bren and the French Hotchkiss series. They had cool swords tho...
Uberdave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th October 2003   #10
106th ID
Forums Poster
 
106th ID's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Illinois
Age: 30
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 0
106th ID is so neutral he might be Swiss
Default

I tossed in Arnim troops. They were the 10th Panzer, Division Manteuffel(aka division von Broich) and the Imperali Itl. inf div., some other stuff thrown in as well.

You're right the Germans didn't quite trust the Italians. Their poor showing can be partly blamed on their equipment. They had underpowered rifles, and unreliable machine guns. They made several sub-machine guns one of which was rather nice, the Beretta 38a. Their tanks were crap as well, light armor, poor off-road performance, and undergunned. They did have good artillery troops though, even if their weapons were sort of old.
106th ID is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:59 AM.

Copyright 1997 - 2009-- CloseCombat.Org All Rights are Reserved.
This site is not affiliated to or has anything relating to the philosophies of any radical, political, racist or fascistic organizations. fight fascism! This site is dedicated and serves as an information-pool to all close combat gamers.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.